George Smith v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| GEORGE SMITH |
| CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
| 22-6002 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Real Property: Torts to Land |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER filed granting motion to dismiss case - voluntarily [ # 8 ] filed by Mr. Kevin Moser. No mandate to issue. (REO) [Entered: 12/08/2022 12:03 PM]
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin Moser for Appellant Mr. George Smith Certificate of Service: 12/07/2022. [22-6002] (KM) [Entered: 12/07/2022 11:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. George Smith by Kevin J. Moser. Certificate of Service: 12/07/2022. [22-6002] (KM) [Entered: 12/07/2022 11:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: The appearance form , [ # 6 ], filed by Mr. Kevin Moser for Mr. George Smith is deficient for the reason noted on the attached checklist. Deficiency to be corrected by 12/07/2022. (RLB) [Entered: 11/30/2022 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Mr. Kevin Moser for Mr. George Smith to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Certificate of Service: 11/29/2022. [22-6002] (KM) [Entered: 11/29/2022 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED - INCORRECT .pdf FORMAT - COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE AS A NON-MODIFIABLE .pdf DOCUMENT*** CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin Moser for Appellant Mr. George Smith Certificate of Service: 11/29/2022. [22-6002]--[Edited 11/30/2022 by RLB] (KM) [Entered: 11/29/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED - INCORRECT .pdf FORMAT - COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE AS A NON-MODIFIABLE .pdf DOCUMENT*** APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. George Smith by Kevin J. Moser. Certificate of Service: 11/29/2022. [22-6002]--[Edited 11/30/2022 by RLB] (KM) [Entered: 11/29/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Rodney D. Payne for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. Certificate of Service: 11/28/2022. [22-6002] (RDP) [Entered: 11/28/2022 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. by Rodney D. Payne. Certificate of Service: 11/28/2022. [22-6002] (RDP) [Entered: 11/28/2022 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 12/20/2022; appellee brief due 01/19/2023. (REO) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. George Smith. Transcript needed: n. (REO) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: George Smith v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: GEORGE SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Moser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Rodney D. Payne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
