USA v. Michael Williams
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS |
| 25-5263 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| United States v. Michael Williams |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER filed: In these consolidated matters, the defendant appeals his criminal judgment, after a guilty plea, for possession with intent to distribute cocaine and a judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a term of imprisonment. The defendant moves to consolidate these causes with Case No. 24-1571, United States v. Damon Allen Patterson. In light of the panels order in Case No. 24-1571 denying consolidation, the defendants motions [ # 21 ] are DENIED AS MOOT. [25-5257, 25-5263] (VLP) [Entered: 08/29/2025 01:57 PM]
|
| Filing 23 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief by 30 days [ # 22 ] filed by Ms. Raven Austin., resetting briefing schedule: appellee brief now due 10/02/2025. [25-5257, 25-5263] (VLP) [Entered: 08/19/2025 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION filed by Ms. Raven Austin for USA in 25-5257, 25-5263 to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 08/19/2025. [25-5257, 25-5263] (RA) [Entered: 08/19/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION filed by Mr. Conrad Kahn for Mr. Michael T. Williams in 25-5257, 25-5263 to consolidate cases NO. 24-1571, NO. 25-5257, & NO. 25-5263. Certificate of Service: 08/11/2025. [25-5257, 25-5263] (CK) [Entered: 08/11/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 20 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Conrad Kahn for Mr. Michael T. Williams in 25-5257, 25-5263. Certificate of Service: 07/25/2025. Argument Request: requested. [25-5257, 25-5263] (CK) [Entered: 07/25/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 19 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief by 30 days [ # 18 ] filed by Mr. Conrad Kahn., resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 07/31/2025. appellee brief now due 09/02/2025. [25-5257, 25-5263] (VLP) [Entered: 07/01/2025 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION filed by Mr. Conrad Kahn for Mr. Michael T. Williams in 25-5257, 25-5263 to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 07/01/2025. [25-5257, 25-5263] (CK) [Entered: 07/01/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 17 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 07/01/2025;. appellee brief due 07/31/2025; [25-5257, 25-5263] (VLP) [Entered: 05/22/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 16 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is already on file in the District Court Clerks Office. Filed by Mr. Conrad Kahn for Mr. Michael T. Williams in 25-5263, 25-5257. Certificate of Service: 05/22/2025. [25-5263, 25-5257] (CK) [Entered: 05/22/2025 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. Michael T. Williams in 25-5263, 25-5257 by Conrad B. Kahn. Certificate of Service: 05/22/2025. [25-5263, 25-5257] (CK) [Entered: 05/22/2025 09:40 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER filed: The retained counsels motion to withdraw [ # 12 ] in No. 25-5263 is GRANTED. The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee by service on FPD Conrad Kahn, and FDSET shall enter its appearance within 10 days of the date of this order. The defendants motions to consolidate [ # 11 ] [ # 7352417-2 ] are GRANTED. [25-5263, 25-5257] (VLP) [Entered: 05/22/2025 09:02 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams for Rich Heinsman to withdraw as counsel for Michael Williams. Certificate of Service: 05/15/2025. [25-5263] (RAH) [Entered: 05/15/2025 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams to consolidate for briefing and submission cases 25-5263 & 25-5257. Certificate of Service: 05/15/2025. [25-5263] (RAH) [Entered: 05/15/2025 09:58 AM] |
Filing 10
Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. Non document order: ORDER granting 93 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis as to Michael T Williams. The Court finds that Defendant Michael T. Williams does not have the funds to retain an attorney of his choice and that Defendant wants to be represented by counsel. As a condition of the appointment of counsel to represent Defendant, the Court reserves the right to require Defendant to repay the government the reasonable value of the services rendered to Defendant by the appointed counsel and any expenses in connection therewith if it is later determined that Defendant has financial resources to make such payment. It is therefore ORDERED that Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. (to include, without limitation, Attorney Erin Rust), be appointed to represent Defendant. This entry is the complete order of the Court. No document is attached. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 5/5/2025. (RO) [Entered: 05/13/2025 03:49 PM]
|
| Filing 9 ***LOCKED - incorrect entry selected, please refile as motion to withdraw as counsel*** Corrected second successive motion filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams. If the respondent chooses to file a response, it is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 05/13/2025. [25-5263]--[Edited 05/13/2025 by RO] (RAH) [Entered: 05/13/2025 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 ***LOCKED - incorrect entry selected, please refile as motion to consolidate*** Corrected second successive motion filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams. If the respondent chooses to file a response, it is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 05/13/2025. [25-5263]--[Edited 05/13/2025 by RO] (RAH) [Entered: 05/13/2025 01:14 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed: counsels motion to withdraw [ # 6 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As the defendants ability to proceed in forma pauperis remains outstanding, the motion to consolidate [ # 5 ] is also DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (RO) [Entered: 04/25/2025 11:28 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams for Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. to withdraw as counsel for Michael T. Williams. Certificate of Service: 04/07/2025. [25-5263] (RAH) [Entered: 04/07/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Mr. Rich A. Heinsman, Jr. for Mr. Michael T. Williams to consolidate cases 25-5263 and 25-5257. Certificate of Service: 04/07/2025. [25-5263] (RAH) [Entered: 04/07/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. Michael T. Williams by Rich A. Heinsman, Jr.. Certificate of Service: 04/07/2025. [25-5263] (RAH) [Entered: 04/07/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Raven D. Austin. Certificate of Service: 03/31/2025. [25-5263] (RA) [Entered: 03/31/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (RO) [Entered: 03/25/2025 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Michael T. Williams. Transcript needed: y. (RO) [Entered: 03/25/2025 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Michael Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Raven Austin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL T. WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Conrad Kahn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.