Barbara Stahl v. Carolyn Colvin
| BARBARA J. STAHL |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 15-1273 |
| February 11, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702662433
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The district court's judgment is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the agency for further proceedings. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6713318-1] [6713318] [15-1273]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Barbara Stahl v. Carolyn Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BARBARA J. STAHL | |
| Represented By: | John Edward Horn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John D. Cooke |
| Represented By: | Cynthia A. Freburg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
