Rigoberto Velasquez-Banegas v. Loretta Lynch
| RIGOBERTO VELASQUEZ-BANEGAS |
| LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States |
| 15-2619 |
| July 31, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702921783
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. We therefore VACATE the decisions of the Board and the immigration judge and REMAND the case for reconsideration in light of the analysis in this opinion. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge, dissenting and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6812763-1] [6812763] [15-2619]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rigoberto Velasquez-Banegas v. Loretta Lynch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RIGOBERTO VELASQUEZ-BANEGAS | |
| Represented By: | Keren Zwick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
