Hernel Silais v. Loretta Lynch
Petitioner: HERNEL SILAIS
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Case Number: 15-3277
Filed: October 14, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 28, 2017 Summary Silais v. Sessions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 702987134 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. The petition for review of the Board s decision is DENIED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. [6837494-1] [6837494] [15-3277]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hernel Silais v. Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: HERNEL SILAIS
Represented By: Geoffrey Heeren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: Raya Jarawan
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Anthony Cardozo Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?