EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
| EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
| UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY |
| 15-3452 |
| November 2, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
703051450
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Conley. AFFIRMED. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and William M. Conley, District Court Judge. [6861579-1] [6861579] [15-3452]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellee: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth E. Theran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Tracy L. Farley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
