Daniel Keys v. Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL W. KEYS
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 16-1745
Filed: April 5, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2017 Daniel Keys v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 702934138 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6817539-1] [6817539] [16-1745]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Keys v. Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DANIEL W. KEYS
Represented By: Barry Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brian J. Alesia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?