Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In

Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In

Plaintiff - Appellee:	SANDRA RIEDERER
Defendant - Appellant:	UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Case Number:	16-3041
Filed:	July 27, 2016
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
November 14, 2016	Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In
July 24, 2018	Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 24, 2018	Filing 703256020 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The decision of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in light of Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018). Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. *Circuit Judge Posner retired on September 2, 2017, and did not participate in the decision of this case, which is being resolved by a quorum of the panel under 28 U.S.C. 46(d). [6940272-1] [6940272] [16-3041]
November 14, 2016	Filing 702881787 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. We have unanimously agreed to decide the case without argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6797330-1] [6797330] [16-3041]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 24, 2018

Filing 703256020 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The decision of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in light of Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018). Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. *Circuit Judge Posner retired on September 2, 2017, and did not participate in the decision of this case, which is being resolved by a quorum of the panel under 28 U.S.C. 46(d). [6940272-1] [6940272] [16-3041]

November 14, 2016

Filing 702881787 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. We have unanimously agreed to decide the case without argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6797330-1] [6797330] [16-3041]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sandra Riederer v. United Healthcare Services, In
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: SANDRA RIEDERER
Represented By:	Larry A. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Represented By:	Katherine Mendez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?