Naperville Smart Meter Awarene v. City of Naperville
NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation |
CITY OF NAPERVILLE |
16-3766 |
October 26, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. City of Naperville |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703269456 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge and Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge. [6945540-1] [6945540] [16-3766] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Naperville Smart Meter Awarene v. City of Naperville | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation | |
Represented By: | Doug E. Ibendahl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CITY OF NAPERVILLE | |
Represented By: | Kristen Foley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.