Mikel Pernell v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
Petitioner / Appellant: MIKEL PERNELL
Respondent / Appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Case Number: 19-1033
Filed: January 4, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2019 Filing 10 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Jacqueline Lashbrook. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [6988234] [19-1033] (Moeller, Nicholas) [Entered: 03/04/2019 09:16 AM]
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The appellee shall provide a complete docketing statement no later than March 8, 2019, that includes the omitted information noted above. (See order for details) DW [9] [6988159] [19-1033] (AP) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:12 PM]
February 27, 2019 Filing 8 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Jacqueline Lashbrook. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [6987392] [19-1033] (Moeller, Nicholas) [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:50 AM]
February 27, 2019 Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Nicholas Moeller for Appellee Jacqueline Lashbrook. [7] [6987380] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1033] [Edited 02/27/2019 by CAG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Moeller, Nicholas) [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:26 AM]
February 25, 2019 Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mikel Pernell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [6987130] [19-1033] (FP) [Entered: 02/26/2019 12:28 PM]
February 25, 2019 Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mikel Pernell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [6986862] [19-1033] (AP) [Entered: 02/25/2019 04:28 PM]
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Mikel Pernell is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Mikel Pernell by 02/25/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7018 0680 0002 2683 0588. JR [4] [6983489] [19-1033] (MM) [Entered: 02/11/2019 11:45 AM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Mikel Pernell leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 02/07/2019. [3] [6982852] [19-1033] (AP) [Entered: 02/07/2019 11:18 AM]
January 22, 2019 Filing 2 Filed notice from the District Court that a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. [2] [6979255] [19-1033] (VG) [Entered: 01/22/2019 01:30 PM]
January 4, 2019 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 11/02/2018. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 01/18/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mikel Pernell by 01/09/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/18/2019 for Appellant Mikel Pernell. [1] [6975905] [19-1033] (AD) [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mikel Pernell v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MIKEL PERNELL
Represented By: Mikel Pernell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Represented By: Michael M. Glick
Represented By: Nicholas Moeller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?