Marshall Cobb, Sr. v. Keith Butts
| KEITH BUTTS, Warden |
| MARSHALL T. COBB, SR. |
| 19-1493 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr. for certificate of appealability. [12] [7001292] [19-1493] (VG) [Entered: 04/29/2019 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 11 Pro se copy of motion filed in the District Court by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr to reconsider ruling on defendant's motion to correct errors and objection to ruling on same [11] [6999655] [19-1493]--[Edited 04/23/2019 by AP- to reflect copy of District court motion] (AP) [Entered: 04/22/2019 04:45 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: This appeal shall proceed to a determination of whether a certificate of appealability should issue. Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [6998785] [19-1493] (ER) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:01 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Exhibits to petitioner's jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr.. [9] [6997811] [19-1493] (PS) [Entered: 04/12/2019 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr.. [8] [6997575] [19-1493] (FP) [Entered: 04/12/2019 09:12 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Status report and request for permission to supplement the record. [ # 6 ] To the extent the pro se appellant seeks to supplement the record on appeal, the request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Before moving to supplement the record on appeal, the appellant must file a formal motion to supplement the record with the district court, accompanied by whatever documents he seeks to add to the record, and await a ruling by that court. See 7th Circ. R. 10(b). He can renew his motion in this court if he is dissatisfied with the district court's ruling. He is cautioned that documents cannot be added to the record on appeal if they were not presented to the district court before it entered judgment. See Gallo v. Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Medical Center, Inc., 907 F.3d 961, 964 (7th Cir. 2018). Any documents that were filed in the district court before it entered judgment will automatically be part of the record on appeal, and there is no need for the appellant to file a motion to supplement the record related to such documents. WLS [7] [6996825] [19-1493] (PS) [Entered: 04/10/2019 09:22 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Status report and request permission to supplement the record filed by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr. [6] [6995949] [19-1493] (AP) [Entered: 04/05/2019 03:36 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Motion for enlargement of time. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the petitioner shall file his response to the court's order dated March 20, 2019, by no later than April 22, 2019. If the petitioner would like to file a separate motion for a certificate of appealability, he may do so by May 6, 2019. In the event that the petitioner does not file a motion by that date, his notice of appeal previously docketed in this court will be deemed to constitute an application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). Finally, to the extent that the petitioner seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, that request is DENIED. Because the petitioners request for a certificate of appealability remains pending, no brief is due at this time. The clerk will set a briefing schedule automatically if this court should issue a certificate of appealability.[ # 4 ] CMD [5] [6995883] [19-1493] (AP) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:27 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr. to extend time. [4] [6994275] [19-1493] (AP) [Entered: 03/29/2019 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 An order has been received from the District Court dated 03/21/2019, denying a certificate of appealability. This appeal shall proceed accordingly. [3] [6992410] [19-1493] (CMD) [Entered: 03/21/2019 02:30 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Petitioner-Appellant Marshall T. Cobb, Sr. shall file, on or before April 3, 2019, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [2] [2] [6992234] [19-1493] (PS) [Entered: 03/20/2019 04:34 PM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 02/21/2019. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. [1] [6991941] [19-1493] (MM) [Entered: 03/20/2019 09:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marshall Cobb, Sr. v. Keith Butts | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: KEITH BUTTS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Andrew A. Kobe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MARSHALL T. COBB, SR. | |
| Represented By: | Marshall T. Cobb Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
