Ronald Perry, et al v. FedEx Ground Package System
| FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED |
| RONALD PERRY and ALAN PACHECO |
| 19-1561 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 10 ] [11][6998846] [19-1561] (FP) [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:22 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/17/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [6998855-2] [6998855] [19-1561] (FP) [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 10 Motion filed by Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry to dismiss case. [10] [6998480] [19-1561] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 04/16/2019 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Beth A. Ross for Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Laible, Kent Whisler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi, Law, Sylvia O'Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo. [9] [6998226] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1561] (Ross, Beth) [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Scott Volez for Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated. [8] [6997291] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1561] --[Edited 04/11/2019 by AP- to reflect addition of counsel] (Voelz, Scott) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry. [7] [6997264] [19-1561] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:07 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 05/24/2019 for Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry. Appellee's brief due on or before 06/24/2019 for FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/15/2019 for Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry. JB [6997067] [19-1561] (AG) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [5] [6997066] [19-1561] (AG) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [6995415] [19-1561] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 04/04/2019 09:39 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Circuit Rule 3(c)(1), referencing Circuit Rule 28(a), requires an appellant to file a docketing statement which provides information concerning appellate jurisdiction. In the present case, appellants Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to set forth the dates on which they filed their notice of appeal. This information must be provided. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellants file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the date that they filed their notice of appeal. The statement is due on or before April 10, 2019. DW [3] [6995298] [19-1561] (AG) [Entered: 04/03/2019 03:57 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [6995088] [19-1561] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 04/03/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry by 04/03/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 04/11/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/07/2019 for Alan Pacheco and Ronald Perry [1] [6993931] [19-1561] (AP) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
