Charles Clark v. Brian Lammer
Respondent / Appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden and BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES CLARK
Case Number: 19-2073
Filed: June 5, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Motion for extension of time to file a memorandum of law. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall file his memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district court's judgment by no later than August 12, 2019. CMD [7] [7014182] [19-2073] (PS) [Entered: 06/27/2019 04:17 PM]
June 27, 2019 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Charles Clark to extend time to file memorandum of law. [6] [7014121] [19-2073] (PS) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:09 PM]
June 20, 2019 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Charles Clark leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/19/2019. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/22/2019 for Appellant Charles Clark [7012508] [5] [7012508] [19-2073] (AP) [Entered: 06/20/2019 10:45 AM]
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Charles Clark is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Charles Clark by 07/03/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7016 0340 0001 1333 7333. [4] [7012254] [19-2073] (AD) [Entered: 06/19/2019 11:17 AM]
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Charles Clark shall have thirty days from the date at the top of this order to file a memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district court's judgment. Briefing in this case is otherwise suspended pending further order of the court. MPB [3] [7010360] [19-2073] (FP) [Entered: 06/11/2019 08:43 AM]
June 5, 2019 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7009562] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [19-2073] (FP) [Entered: 06/06/2019 12:08 PM]
June 5, 2019 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/19/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Charles Clark by 06/11/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/19/2019 for Appellant Charles Clark. [1] [7009513] [19-2073] (FP) [Entered: 06/06/2019 10:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Clark v. Brian Lammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES CLARK
Represented By: Charles Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?