Thomas Powers v. Paula Lodge, et al
| THOMAS POWERS |
| TAMMY TEEL, CASSANDRA SIMMONS and PAULA LODGE |
| 19-2182 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Motion for voluntary dismissal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 4 ][5][7015565] [19-2182] (PS) [Entered: 07/08/2019 09:28 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/08/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7015582-2] [7015582] [19-2182] (PS) [Entered: 07/08/2019 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [4] [7015441] [19-2182] (AP) [Entered: 07/03/2019 03:09 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7012659] [3] Memorandum due for Appellant Thomas Powers by 07/03/2019. DW [3] [7012659] [19-2182] (ER) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Thomas Powers. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7012531] [19-2182] (VG) [Entered: 06/20/2019 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Thomas Powers by 06/24/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 07/03/2019. [1] [7012454] [19-2182] (AG) [Entered: 06/20/2019 09:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
