Sonny Davis v. Mark Sevier, et al
| TAYLOR WALL, Law Library Supervisor, CRYSTAL CLEARY, Law Library Supervisor, MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent and ZHENAY NEWHOUSE, Law Library Supervisor |
| SONNY M. DAVIS, also known as Sonny Davis |
| 19-2229 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Sonny M. Davis leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/01/2019. [4] [7021183] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/03/2019. [19-2229] (DSL) [Entered: 08/02/2019 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7017757] [19-2229] (DSL) [Entered: 07/17/2019 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Aaron T. Craft for Appellee Mark R. Sevier, Zhenay Newhouse, Taylor Wall, and Crystal Cleary. [2] [7015748] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2229]--[Edited 07/09/2019 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel, clarify document filed and parties represented.] (Craft, Aaron) [Entered: 07/08/2019 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 07/29/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 07/11/2019. [1] [7014250] [19-2229] (MM) [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
