Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al v. Chicago Park District, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT and CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIA VALENCIA and PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC.
Case Number: 19-2308
Filed: July 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 21, 2020 Summary Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Chicago Park District

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Joseph P. Roddy for Appellee Chicago Park District has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [16] [7025247] [19-2308] (LJ) [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:25 PM]
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief [ # 14 ] Appellants' brief due on or before 09/25/2019 for Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. Appellees' briefs due on or before 10/25/2019 for Chicago Park District and City of Chicago. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/15/2019 for Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. CMD [15] [7021320] [19-2308] (VG) [Entered: 08/02/2019 12:25 PM]
August 2, 2019 Filing 14 Motion filed by Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia to extend time to file appellant brief. [14] [7021169] [19-2308] (Epstein, Richard) [Entered: 08/02/2019 08:57 AM]
August 2, 2019 Filing 13 Appearance form filed by Attorney Elizabeth Mary Tisher for Appellee City of Chicago. [13] [7021163] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2308]-[Edited 08/02/2019 by VG - to reflect addition of counsel] (Tisher, Elizabeth) [Entered: 08/02/2019 08:43 AM]
July 31, 2019 Filing 12 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Richard A. Epstein for Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. [12] [7020918] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2308]--[Edited 08/01/2019 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Epstein, Richard) [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:09 PM]
July 31, 2019 Filing 11 Appearance form filed by Attorney Susan M. Horner for Appellee Chicago Park District. [11] [7020824] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2308] --[Edited 07/31/2019 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Horner, Susan) [Entered: 07/31/2019 03:30 PM]
July 30, 2019 Filing 10 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. [10] [7020585] [19-2308] (Rachlis, Michael) [Entered: 07/30/2019 04:15 PM]
July 30, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [9] [7020555] [19-2308] (CAG) [Entered: 07/30/2019 03:29 PM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 8 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7019370] [19-2308] (Rachlis, Michael) [Entered: 07/24/2019 05:57 PM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. [7] [7019363] [19-2308] (Rachlis, Michael) [Entered: 07/24/2019 05:20 PM]
July 24, 2019 Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Joseph P. Roddy for Appellee Chicago Park District. [6] [7019179] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2308]-[Edited 07/24/2019 by VG - to reflect addition of counsel] (Roddy, Joseph) [Entered: 07/24/2019 12:10 PM]
July 23, 2019 Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney BENNA RUTH SOLOMON for Appellee City of Chicago. [5] [7019021] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2308] -[Edited 07/24/2019 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Solomon, Benna) [Entered: 07/23/2019 04:41 PM]
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Circuit Rule 3(c)(1), referencing Circuit Rule 28(a), requires an appellant to file a docketing statement which identifies the provision of the constitution or federal statute involved if, as appellants claim, jurisdiction is based on the existence of a federal question pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331. In the present case, appellants Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to set forth the federal statute or constitutional provision involved in this case. Appellants must provide this information. It is insufficient to cite 28 U.S.C. 1331. Accordingly, appellants shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before July 25, 2019. DW [4] [7018118] [19-2308] (AD) [Entered: 07/18/2019 11:48 AM]
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7017927] [19-2308] (Rachlis, Michael) [Entered: 07/17/2019 03:19 PM]
July 11, 2019 Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney MYRIAM ZRECZNY KASPER for Appellee City of Chicago. [2] [7016806] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2308]--[Edited 07/12/2019 by PS]--[Edited 07/12/2019 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Kasper, Myriam) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:29 PM]
July 11, 2019 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia by 07/17/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 07/25/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 08/20/2019 for Protect Our Parks, Inc. and Maria Valencia. [1] [7016731] [19-2308] (ER) [Entered: 07/11/2019 11:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Protect Our Parks, Inc., et al v. Chicago Park District, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Pall
Represented By: Susan M. Horner
Represented By: Joseph P. Roddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO
Represented By: Myriam Z. Kasper
Represented By: Benna Ruth Solomon
Represented By: Elizabeth Tisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARIA VALENCIA
Represented By: Michael Rachlis
Represented By: Richard Epstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC.
Represented By: Michael Rachlis
Represented By: Richard Epstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?