Matthew McDowell v. William Pollard
| MATTHEW A. MCDOWELL |
| WILLIAM POLLARD |
| 19-2991 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re: The Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on October 24, 2019. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal shall proceed to a determination whether a certificate of appealability should issue. Briefing in this appeal shall continue to be SUSPENDED until further court order. DW [7039748] [19-2991] (AG) [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:31 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Matthew A. McDowell. [8] [7039104] [19-2991] (Rose, Christopher) [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Certificate of Service to Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed on 10/24/2019 by Appellant Matthew A. McDowell. [7] [7039103] [19-2991] (Rose, Christopher) [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Matthew A. McDowell Motion for Certificate of Appealability. [6] [7039090] [19-2991]--[Edited 10/24/2019 by AD - Correct version of doc #5 in Native PDF format.] (Rose, Christopher) [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellant Matthew A. McDowell Motion for Certificate of Appealability. [5] [7038983] [19-2991]--[Edited 10/24/2019 by AD - This is a Scanned PDF; a Native PDF must be submitted.] (Rose, Christopher) [Entered: 10/24/2019 10:34 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the date(s) of consent of the parties. The statement is due on or before 10/29/2019. (See order for further details). DW [4] [7038369] [19-2991] (MM) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:03 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Matthew A. McDowell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7038022] [19-2991] (AD) [Entered: 10/21/2019 11:23 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Petitionerappellant McDowell shall file, on or before October 24, 2019, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [2] [2] [7036017] [19-2991] (ER) [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:33 PM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 09/24/2019. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Matthew A. McDowell by 10/16/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 10/23/2019. [1] [7035934] [19-2991] (AP) [Entered: 10/10/2019 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Matthew McDowell v. William Pollard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MATTHEW A. MCDOWELL | |
| Represented By: | Christopher William Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WILLIAM POLLARD | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
