Adam Hoipkemier v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM HOIPKEMIER
Defendant / Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN IEHL, WINDIE BISHOP, ALBERT PIETERSON, JOHN HASTINGS and JOSEPH DUNN
Case Number: 20-1080
Filed: January 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re: Joint Stipulation and Mutual Waiver Agreement Waiving Further Proceedings and Recovery of Attorneys Fees and Costs. This notice will be filed without further court action. JLW [24] [7068416] [20-1080] (AD) [Entered: 03/13/2020 12:27 PM]
March 10, 2020 Filing 23 Filed Notice of Joint Stipulation and Mutual Waiver Agreement Waiving Further Proceedings and Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Costs by Appellees Joseph Dunn, John Hastings, Helen Iehl and Albert Pieterson. [23] [7067851] [20-1080] (Kaufman, Andrew) [Entered: 03/10/2020 06:40 PM]
March 9, 2020 Filing 22 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. [22] [20-1080] (JR) [Entered: 03/09/2020 03:26 PM]
February 27, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Rebecca Snavely Saelao for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [21] [7065395] [20-1080] (LJ) [Entered: 02/27/2020 12:17 PM]
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER re: 1. Plaintiff-Appellees' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Affirmance. 2. Appellant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs-Appellees' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Affirmance. 3. Reply in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees' Motion to Dimiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Affirmance. [ # 7 ] The appellees motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is summarily AFFIRMED. (See order for further details). Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge; David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge and Amy C. Barrett, Circuit Judge. [20] [7064768] [20-1080] (MM) [Entered: 02/25/2020 12:38 PM]
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 18 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 03/16/2020 for Adam Hoipkemier. Appellees' briefs due on or before 04/15/2020 for Windie Bishop, Joseph Dunn, John Hastings, Helen Iehl, Albert Pieterson and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/06/2020 for Appellant Adam Hoipkemier. CMD [19] [7061292] [20-1080] (MM) [Entered: 02/10/2020 11:17 AM]
February 9, 2020 Filing 18 Motion filed by Appellant Adam Hoipkemier to extend time to file appellant brief. [18] [7061219] [20-1080] (Epps, Kevin) [Entered: 02/09/2020 12:54 PM]
February 7, 2020 Filing 17 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael Bornhorst for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [17] [7061063] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080] (Bornhorst, Michael) [Entered: 02/07/2020 01:36 PM]
February 7, 2020 Filing 16 Filed Reply in support of Appellees Windie Bishop, Joseph Dunn, John Hastings, Helen Iehl and Albert Pieterson Motion to Dismiss / Summary Affirmance filed 01/21/2020. Exhibit F attached. (Dkt. 7). [16][7061016] [20-1080]--[Edited 02/07/2020 by ER - To reflect correct document title and Exhibit F attached] (Kaufman, Andrew) [Entered: 02/07/2020 11:29 AM]
February 3, 2020 Filing 15 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Kevin Epps for Appellant Adam Hoipkemier. [15] [7059977] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080] (Epps, Kevin) [Entered: 02/03/2020 12:29 PM]
February 3, 2020 Filing 14 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellant Adam Hoipkemier Attorney Kevin E. Epps to Plaintiffs-Appellees' Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Affirmance. [14][7059922] [20-1080] (Epps, Kevin) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:41 AM]
January 28, 2020 Filing 13 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Adam Hoipkemier. [13] [7058975] [20-1080] (JR) [Entered: 01/28/2020 12:28 PM]
January 28, 2020 Filing 12 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mark D. Lonergan for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [12] [7058967] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080]-[Edited 01/28/2020 by VG - to reflect addition of counsel] (Lonergan, Mark) [Entered: 01/28/2020 12:14 PM]
January 27, 2020 Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Rebecca Snavely Saelao for party(s) Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in case 20-1080 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rebecca S. Saelao for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [11] [7058646] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080]--[Edited 01/27/2020 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Saelao, Rebecca) [Entered: 01/27/2020 10:42 AM]
January 27, 2020 Filing 10 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mark D. Lonergan for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. [10] [7058642] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080] (Saelao, Rebecca) [Entered: 01/27/2020 10:38 AM]
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE. Appellant Adam Hoipkemier shall file a response to the motion, specifically addressing the movants request for summary affirmance, on or before February 4, 2020. JLW [9] [7058429] [20-1080] (AD) [Entered: 01/24/2020 02:07 PM]
January 22, 2020 Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Andrew R. Kaufman for Appellant Adam Hoipkemier. [8] [7057581] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080]--[Edited 01/22/2020 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Kaufman, Andrew) [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:47 AM]
January 21, 2020 Filing 7 Motion filed by Appellees Windie Bishop, Joseph Dunn, John Hastings, Helen Iehl and Albert Pieterson to dismiss case. [7] [7057320] [20-1080] (Selbin, Jonathan) [Entered: 01/21/2020 01:48 PM]
January 21, 2020 Filing 6 Amended Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant Adam Hoipkemier. [6] [7057101] [20-1080] (Epps, Kevin) [Entered: 01/21/2020 08:58 AM]
January 17, 2020 Filing 5 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Lisa Barnes, Angela Garr and Myesha Prather. [5] [7056906] [20-1080] (AD) [Entered: 01/17/2020 11:58 AM]
January 17, 2020 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Jonathan D. Selbin for party(s) Appellee Albert Pieterson Appellee Windie Bishop Appellee John Hastings Appellee Joseph Dunn Appellee Helen Iehl, in case 20-1080 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jonathan D. Selbin for Joseph Dunn, Helen Iehl, Albert Pieterson, John Hastings, Windie Bishop, Lisa Barnes, Angela Garr, and Myesha Prather, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. [4] [7056871] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080]--[Edited 01/17/2020 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Selbin, Jonathan) [Entered: 01/17/2020 10:47 AM]
January 17, 2020 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Daniel M. Hutchinson for Joseph Dunn, Helen Iehl, Albert Pieterson, John Hastings, Windie Bishop, Lisa Barnes, Angela Garr, and Myesha Prather, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. [3] [7056869] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1080] (Hutchinson, Daniel) [Entered: 01/17/2020 10:42 AM]
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER:Circuit Rule 3(c)(1), referencing Circuit Rule 28(a), requires an appellant to file a docketing statement which identifies the provision of the constitution or federal statute involved if, as appellant claims, jurisdiction is based on the existence of a federal question pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331. In the present case, appellants Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to set forth the federal statute or constitutional provision involved in this case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before January 22, 2020. [2] [2] [7056502] [20-1080] (VG) [Entered: 01/16/2020 08:07 AM]
January 15, 2020 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/24/2020 for Adam Hoipkemier. Transcript information sheet due by 01/29/2020 [1] [7056310] [20-1080] (VG) [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adam Hoipkemier v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADAM HOIPKEMIER
Represented By: Kevin Epps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Represented By: Michael H. Bornhorst
Represented By: Rebecca Snavely Saelao
Represented By: Mark D. Lonergan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: HELEN IEHL
Represented By: Jonathan D. Selbin
Represented By: Andrew Kaufman
Represented By: Daniel Morris Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: WINDIE BISHOP
Represented By: Jonathan D. Selbin
Represented By: Andrew Kaufman
Represented By: Daniel Morris Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: ALBERT PIETERSON
Represented By: Jonathan D. Selbin
Represented By: Andrew Kaufman
Represented By: Daniel Morris Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JOHN HASTINGS
Represented By: Jonathan D. Selbin
Represented By: Andrew Kaufman
Represented By: Daniel Morris Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JOSEPH DUNN
Represented By: Jonathan D. Selbin
Represented By: Andrew Kaufman
Represented By: Daniel Morris Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?