John Cole, Jr. v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
| RICHARD BROWN, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., BEVERLY GILMORE, JERRY SNYDER and BRUCE LEMMON |
| JOHN C. COLE, JR. |
| 20-1846 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Appearance form filed by Attorney Aaron T. Craft for Appellees Richard Brown, Robert E. Carter, Jr., Beverly Gilmore, Bruce Lemmon and Jerry Snyder. [10] [7094350] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-1846] --[Edited 07/17/2020 by ER - added Attorney Aaron T. Craft] (Craft, Aaron) [Entered: 07/17/2020 01:27 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion for Leave of the Court to File a Motion for Relief From Judgments With U.S. District Court, for Southern District of Indiana Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(B). A review of the district courts docket indicates that appellant John Coles claims under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment are proceeding in the district court. He does not need permission from this court to file a motion addressing the merits of his case in the district court. Accordingly, the motion will be filed without court action. CMD [9] [7090282] [20-1846] (MM) [Entered: 06/30/2020 12:50 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John C. Cole, Jr. for leave of the court to file a motion for relief from judgments with U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). [8] [7090163] [20-1846] (CAH) [Entered: 06/30/2020 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant John C. Cole, Jr. Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [7] [7090162] [20-1846] (CAH) [Entered: 06/30/2020 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant John C. Cole, Jr. to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7090161] [20-1846] (CAH) [Entered: 06/30/2020 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed district court order dated 06/29/2020, Order Denying Second Motion for Permission to Appeal in Forma Pauperis and Discussing Misrepresentations in Motions - The instant motion for "permission to appeal in forma pauperis is denied for the same reasons explained in the Court's Order of May 27, 2020, denying the first such motion. [5] [7089798] [20-1846] (CM) [Entered: 06/29/2020 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant John C. Cole, Jr. leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/27/2020. [4] [7083470] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/26/2020 [20-1846] (CM) [Entered: 05/27/2020 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7082158] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-1846] (ER) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Matt Leohr, Jim Hendrix, Andrea N. Stroup, Karen Stuber, Randall Purcell, Ammerman, J. Collins and Charles Dugan. [2] [7082156] [20-1846] (ER) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant John C. Cole Jr. by 05/26/2020. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/19/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 06/03/2020. [1] [7082145] [20-1846] (ER) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
