Antonio Crawford v. United States District Court
| ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS |
| 20-2224 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Antonio D. Crawford. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7099093] [20-2224] (CAH) [Entered: 08/06/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 Prose PLRA Memorandum filed by Appellant Antonio D. Crawford. [6] [7098271] [20-2224]--[Edited 08/04/2020 by CM] (CM) [Entered: 08/04/2020 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Antonio D. Crawford to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7098270] [20-2224] (CM) [Entered: 08/04/2020 09:20 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant Antonio D. Crawford is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Antonio D. Crawford by 08/10/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 2532. [4] [7096229] [20-2224] (AD) [Entered: 07/27/2020 09:08 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Antonio D. Crawford leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (See order for further details). Date IFP denied: 07/22/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/21/2020 for Appellant Antonio D. Crawford. [7095476] [3] [7095476] [20-2224] (MM) [Entered: 07/22/2020 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7092333] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-2224] (AP) [Entered: 07/09/2020 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's other case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Antonio D. Crawford by 07/15/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/22/2020 for Appellant Antonio D. Crawford. Transcript information sheet due by 07/22/2020. Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Antonio D. Crawford by 07/15/2020. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/07/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 07/22/2020. [1] [7092329] [20-2224]--[Edited 07/10/2020 by AP- to reflect correct case type] (AP) [Entered: 07/09/2020 12:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Antonio Crawford v. United States District Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD | |
| Represented By: | Antonio D. Crawford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
