Tracey Hardy v. Ron Neal
| RON NEAL |
| TRACEY A. HARDY |
| 20-2378 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Supporting direct evidence filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy.[12] [7109682] [20-2378] (CAH) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 Prose motion filed by Party Tracey A. Hardy to supplement the record on appeal. 1 copy of exhibits tendered. [11] [7108690] [20-2378] (CAH) [Entered: 09/17/2020 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy for reconsideration of denied motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7104921] [20-2378] (CAH) [Entered: 09/01/2020 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed affidavit in support of in forma pauperis and prisoner trust fund account statement, along with supporting evidence exhibits, by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy. [9] [7102623] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy of discovery for trial evidence. [8] [7102617] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy for appointment of counsel to pursue appeal. [7] [7102611] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7102610] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 Renewed pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy for certificate of appealability. [5] [7102609] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy to reconsider denied motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7102606] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order regarding [53] MOTION for Copy of Clerk's Record, [52] MOTION to Appoint Counsel, [51] MOTION for Certificate of Appealability, [48] MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, and [45] MOTION for Release. The plaintiffs motions (ECF 45, 48, 51, 52, 53) are DENIED. Date IFP denied: 07/28/2020. [3] [7100210] [20-2378] (JR) [Entered: 08/11/2020 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tracey A. Hardy to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7100175] [20-2378] (PS) [Entered: 08/11/2020 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 07/09/2020. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/10/2020. [1] [7096757] [20-2378] (FP) [Entered: 07/28/2020 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tracey Hardy v. Ron Neal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: RON NEAL | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: TRACEY A. HARDY | |
| Represented By: | Tracey A. Hardy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
