Katherine Black v. Cherie Wrigley, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHERINE BLACK
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN A. RAPHAN, P.C., PAMELA KERR, MELISSA COHENSON and CHERIE WRIGLEY
Case Number: 20-2656
Filed: September 1, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 10, 2021 Summary Black v. Wrigley

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Filing 14 Added Attorney(s) Andrew Mancilla for party(s) Appellee Cherie Wrigley, in case 20-2656 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Andrew Mancilla for Appellee Cherie Wrigley. [14] [7118420] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2656]--[Edited 10/30/2020 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Mancilla, Andrew) [Entered: 10/29/2020 04:35 PM]
October 22, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mr. Robert Mario Fantone, Jr. for Appellee Cherie Wrigley has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [13] [7116590] [20-2656] (LJ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 12:00 PM]
October 15, 2020 Filing 12 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Robert Fantone for Appellee Cherie Wrigley. [12] [7114968] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [20-2656]--[Edited 10/15/2020 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Fantone, Robert) [Entered: 10/15/2020 02:01 PM]
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief [ # 9 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 11/13/2020 for Katherine Black. Appellees' briefs due on or before 12/14/2020 for Brian A. Raphan, P.C., Melissa Cohenson, Pamela Kerr and Cherie Wrigley. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/04/2021 for Appellant Katherine Black. CMD [11] [7114765] [20-2656] (ER) [Entered: 10/15/2020 08:41 AM]
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Plaintiff-appellant motion to receive access to the electronic submission system, filed on 10/13/20. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Appellant Katherine Black is granted permission to electronically file documents in appeal No. 20-2656. This court's Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuit's website: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate Blacks status as an electronic filer upon the termination of this appeal, termination of Blacks pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. [ # 8 ] TDK [10] [7114724] [20-2656] (FP) [Entered: 10/14/2020 04:54 PM]
October 13, 2020 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Katherine Black to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7114419] [20-2656] (MAN) [Entered: 10/14/2020 09:40 AM]
October 13, 2020 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Katherine Black to become an electronic filer. [8] [7114353] [20-2656] (DRS) [Entered: 10/14/2020 07:27 AM]
September 18, 2020 Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Katherine Black. [7] [7109017] [20-2656] (JR) [Entered: 09/18/2020 03:04 PM]
September 18, 2020 Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Katherine Black. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7109016] [20-2656] (JR) [Entered: 09/18/2020 03:04 PM]
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Katherine Black is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Katherine Black by 10/01/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0140 0000 6080 4246. [5] [7108448] [20-2656] (AD) [Entered: 09/17/2020 09:23 AM]
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/14/2020 for Katherine Black. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/13/2020 for Brian A. Raphan, P.C., Melissa Cohenson, Pamela Kerr and Cherie Wrigley. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/04/2020 for Appellant Katherine Black [4] [7107443] [20-2656] (CM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 01:23 PM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [3] [7107441] [20-2656] (CM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 01:21 PM]
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7105280] DW [2] [7105280] [20-2656] (AD) [Entered: 09/02/2020 03:17 PM]
September 1, 2020 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Katherine Black by 09/08/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 09/15/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/15/2020 for Appellant Katherine Black. [1] [7105123] [20-2656] (MM) [Entered: 09/02/2020 10:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Katherine Black v. Cherie Wrigley, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KATHERINE BLACK
Represented By: Katherine Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIAN A. RAPHAN, P.C.
Represented By: Thomas M. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAMELA KERR
Represented By: Steven P. Mandell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MELISSA COHENSON
Represented By: Thomas M. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHERIE WRIGLEY
Represented By: Andrew M. Hale
Represented By: Robert Mario Fantone Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Mancilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?