Howard Johnson v. Frederick Entzel
FREDERICK ENTZEL |
HOWARD JOHNSON |
20-3023 |
October 19, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Received partial filing fee from the District Court of $5.00 from Appellant Howard Johnson on 12/10/2020. [10] [7127769] [20-3023] (CM) [Entered: 12/11/2020 09:21 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [9] [7127259] [20-3023] (AD) [Entered: 12/09/2020 01:29 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/09/2020 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7127263-2] [7127263] [20-3023] (AD) [Entered: 12/09/2020 01:37 PM] |
Filing 8 Supplement to in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Howard Johnson.[8] [7123550] [20-3023] (CAH) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:41 PM] |
Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Howard Johnson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7122558] [20-3023] (CM) [Entered: 11/18/2020 02:26 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Howard Johnson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/03/2020. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/04/2020 for Appellant Howard Johnson [7119489] [6] [7119489] [20-3023] (AP) [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Howard Johnson is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Howard Johnson by 11/18/2020. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 1131. [5] [7119458] [20-3023] (AD) [Entered: 11/04/2020 09:04 AM] |
Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney W. Scott Simpson for Appellee Frederick Entzel. [4] [7118504] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [20-3023] [4] [7118504] [20-3023]--[Edited 10/30/2020 by ZNS to reflect the termination and addition of counsel] (Simpson, W.) [Entered: 10/30/2020 10:01 AM] |
Filing 3 Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [3] [7118421] [20-3023] (CG) [Entered: 10/29/2020 04:35 PM] |
Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant Howard Johnson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7118358] [20-3023] (MAN) [Entered: 10/29/2020 03:45 PM] |
Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Howard Johnson by 10/26/2020. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/02/2020 for Appellant Howard Johnson. Transcript information sheet due by 11/02/2020. [1] [7115841] [20-3023] (AG) [Entered: 10/20/2020 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Howard Johnson v. Frederick Entzel | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: FREDERICK ENTZEL | |
Represented By: | Douglas J. Quivey |
Represented By: | W. Scott Simpson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: HOWARD JOHNSON | |
Represented By: | Howard Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.