Michael Rankins v. USA, et al
| J. E. KRUEGER, Warden, Regional Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General; is being sued in individual and official capacity, T. J. WATSON, Warden, Complex Warden; is being sued in individual and official capacity, H. HURWITZ, Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice; is being sued in individual and official capacity |
| MICHAEL RANKINS |
| 20-3124 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Michael Rankins leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/23/2020. [7] [7123525] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/23/2020 [20-3124] (CM) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:15 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER re: Appellant's motion for extension of time. A review of the docket indicates that the appellant filed his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement on November 13, 2020. Also, the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending before the district court. Because this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, all proceedings in this appeal are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). Because the appellant has no pending deadlines, the motion for an extension of time will be filed without further court action. [6] [7122394] CMD [20-3124] (AG) [Entered: 11/18/2020 08:55 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Rankins. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7121675] [20-3124] (CM) [Entered: 11/13/2020 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael Rankins to extend time. [4] [7121665] [20-3124] (CM) [Entered: 11/13/2020 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: B. Lamer, Debora G. Schult, and William E. Wilson. [3] [7118500] [20-3124] (ZNS) [Entered: 10/30/2020 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7118489] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [20-3124] (ZNS) [Entered: 10/30/2020 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Rankins by 11/04/2020. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/30/2020. Transcript information sheet due by 11/12/2020. [1] [7118483] [20-3124] (ZNS) [Entered: 10/30/2020 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Rankins v. USA, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: J. E. KRUEGER, Warden, Regional Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General; is being sued in individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden, Complex Warden; is being sued in individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: H. HURWITZ, Director; is being sued in individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice; is being sued in individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL RANKINS | |
| Represented By: | Michael Rankins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
