Mark McCleskey, et al v. CWG Plastering, LLC
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS |
CWG PLASTERING, LLC |
21-1245 |
February 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/06/2021 for CWG Plastering, LLC. Appellees' brief due on or before 06/07/2021 for Indiana State Council of Plasterers and Cement Masons Health and Welfare and Pension Funds and Mark McCleskey. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/28/2021 for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC. RJS [7151740] [21-1245] (ER) [Entered: 04/05/2021 09:44 AM] |
Filing 10 ORDER: Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC by 04/13/2021. [10] [7150794] [21-1245] (AD) [Entered: 03/30/2021 03:34 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER: This appeal, as LIMITED, shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows:Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/05/2021 for CWG Plastering, LLC. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/05/2021 for Indiana State Council of Plasterers and Cement Masons Health and Welfare and Pension Funds and Mark McCleskey. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/26/2021 for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC. (See order for details) DW [7143719] [21-1245] (AP) [Entered: 02/24/2021 03:12 PM] |
Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC by 03/10/2021. [8] [7143447] [21-1245] (AD) [Entered: 02/24/2021 09:45 AM] |
Filing 7 Amended Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC. [7] [7143408] [21-1245] (Pawloski, John) [Entered: 02/23/2021 11:00 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Contact Information for Mediation by Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC. [6] [7143407] [21-1245] (Pawloski, John) [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:41 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC. [5] [7143099] [21-1245] (Pawloski, John) [Entered: 02/22/2021 09:34 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. [4] RJS [7140839] [21-1245] (AG) [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:59 AM] |
Filing 3 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [3] [7140838] [21-1245] (AG) [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:57 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the January 7, 2021 order regarding attorney fees. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7140383] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC by 02/23/2021. DW [2] [7140383] [21-1245] (ZNS) [Entered: 02/09/2021 12:28 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant CWG Plastering, LLC by 02/12/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 02/22/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/22/2021 for CWG Plastering, LLC [1] [7140274] [21-1245] (ER) [Entered: 02/09/2021 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.