Terrance Prude v. Anthony Meli, et al
TERRANCE PRUDE |
GARY BOUGHTON and ANTHONY MELI |
21-1333 |
February 23, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [6] [7148815] [21-1333] (CM) [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:43 AM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 02/26/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7148817-2] [7148817] [21-1333] (CM) [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:47 AM] |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Terrance Prude in 21-1320, 21-1333 to continue in forma pauperis status in the Court of Appeals. [3] [7144214] [21-1320, 21-1333] (CAH) [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:45 AM] |
Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Terrance Prude in 21-1320, 21-1333 for appointment of counsel. [2] [7144213] [21-1320, 21-1333] (CAH) [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:44 AM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 02/26/2021 Final Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7144354-2] [7144354] [21-1333] (FP) [Entered: 02/26/2021 05:37 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/09/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/25/2021. [1] [7143474] [21-1333] (AD) [Entered: 02/24/2021 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.