Charles Schwab & Co. v. Felipe Gomez
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.
Defendant / Appellant: FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Case Number: 21-2531
Filed: August 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 22, 2022 Charles Schwab & Co. v. Felipe Gomez

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Response to July 28, 2021 Rule to show cause, filed on 8/11/2021. In light of the consolidation order dated August 26, 2021, IT IS ORDERED that briefing in these appeals will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 09/27/2021 for Felipe N. Gomez. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/27/2021 for Charles Schwab & Co.. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/17/2021 for Appellant Felipe N. Gomez. Further, the rule to show cause in appeal no. 21-1344 dated July 28, 2021, is SUSPENDED pending the appellants compliance with this order. Finally, any request to refund filing fees should be made in the district court. Failure to file a brief by this due date will result in the dismissal of this appeal for failure to prosecute.CMD Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 3357. [6] [7181802] [21-1344, 21-2531] (FP) [Entered: 08/26/2021 03:40 PM]
August 26, 2021 Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Felipe N. Gomez leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 08/26/2021. [5] [7181778] [21-2531] (AP) [Entered: 08/26/2021 03:07 PM]
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders that these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule, however, will not be reset (if at all) until the court rules on the show cause order which issued on July 28, 2021. DW [4] [7181645] [21-1344, 21-2531] (CG) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:09 PM]
August 20, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Felipe N. Gomez in 21-2531, 21-1344. [3] [7180580] [21-2531, 21-1344] (Gomez, Felipe) [Entered: 08/20/2021 02:11 PM]
August 20, 2021 Filing 2 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Felipe N. Gomez. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-1344 [2] [7180569] [21-2531] (Gomez, Felipe) [Entered: 08/20/2021 01:44 PM]
August 19, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Felipe N. Gomez by 08/18/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 09/02/2021. [1] [7180516] [21-2531] (MM) [Entered: 08/20/2021 11:11 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Schwab & Co. v. Felipe Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: CHARLES SCHWAB & CO.
Represented By: Brian E. Casey
Represented By: Vincent Paul Schmeltz III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Represented By: Felipe N. Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?