Larry Flenoid v. Steve Kallis
Petitioner / Appellant: LARRY FLENOID
Respondent / Appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden and STEVE KALLIS, Warden
Case Number: 22-1298
Filed: February 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: This case shall proceed to a determination of whether to summarily affirm the district court's judgment on the basis of the opening brief and the record. Briefing in this case is otherwise suspended pending further order of the court MPB [7230208] [22-1298] (AP) [Entered: 04/15/2022 04:09 PM]
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Letter regarding court fees, filed on 4/6/2022. A review of the docket indicates that on April 5, 2022, this court received confirmation that the appellant paid the $505.00 appellate filing fees. Accordingly, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. SCR [11] [7228335] [22-1298] (FP) [Entered: 04/08/2022 09:35 AM]
April 7, 2022 Filing 10 Appellee T. J. Watson in 22-1298 substituted by Appellee Steve Kallis in 22-1298, pursuant to FRAP 43(c). [10] [7228057] [22-1298]--[Edited 04/07/2022 by FP, per the letter of 4/6/2022 to reflect change of warden. See dkt. entry # 9.] (FP) [Entered: 04/07/2022 11:50 AM]
April 6, 2022 Filing 9 Filed letter from Appellant Larry Flenoid regarding court fees. [9] [7227853] [22-1298] (CAH) [Entered: 04/06/2022 03:08 PM]
April 6, 2022 Filing 8 Filed notice of change of custodian by Appellant Larry Flenoid. [8] [7227852] [22-1298] (CAH) [Entered: 04/06/2022 03:07 PM]
April 5, 2022 Filing 7 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [7] [7227606] [22-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:29 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 6 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/14/2022 for Appellant Larry Flenoid. [6] [7226670] [22-1298] (AD) [Entered: 03/31/2022 04:39 PM]
March 28, 2022 Filing 5 1 copy of Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Larry Flenoid. Disk not required. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [5] [7225671] [22-1298] (GW) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:21 PM]
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: In light of the district courts order of 03/11/2022, denying petitioner-appellant Larry Flenoids motion for reconsideration, this appeal shall proceed to a determination of appellants fee status on appeal. Briefing in this appeal shall continue to be SUSPENDED until further court order. DW [7224880] [22-1298] (MM) [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:45 PM]
March 4, 2022 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Larry Flenoid. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7221133] [22-1298] (MAN) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:36 PM]
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely Rule 59 motion is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district court's civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). IT IS ORDERED that petitioner -appellant Larry Flenoid shall file, on or before March 11, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [2] [2] [7219586] [22-1298] (AP) [Entered: 02/25/2022 02:11 PM]
February 24, 2022 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Larry Flenoid by 03/03/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/10/2022 for Appellant Larry Flenoid. Transcript information sheet due by 03/10/2022. [1] [7219479] [22-1298] (HTP) [Entered: 02/25/2022 10:01 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Larry Flenoid v. Steve Kallis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LARRY FLENOID
Represented By: Larry Flenoid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden
Represented By: Brian L. Reitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STEVE KALLIS, Warden
Represented By: Brian L. Reitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?