Deon Duke v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEON LEWIS DUKE, formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing, formerly doing business as Deon LLC, formerly doing business as Option Inc
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ALPHABET INC., META PLATFORMS, INC. and CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Case Number: 22-2455
Filed: August 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act 2016(DTSA)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2023 Filing 14 Filed order from the Supreme Court DENYING the Petition for Writ of Certiorari. 22-6398 [14] [7293933] [22-2455] (PS) [Entered: 02/27/2023 03:56 PM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 13 Filed notice from the Supreme Court of the filing of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. 22-6398 [13] [7281702] [22-2455] (PS) [Entered: 12/28/2022 04:34 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 12 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [12] [7265018] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 10/06/2022 09:22 AM]
October 6, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/14/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7265020-2] [7265020] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 10/06/2022 09:26 AM]
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Protection Emergency Motion for a Suspension on the Rules. 2. Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons. 3. Petition for Motions/Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. 4. Exhibits. 5. Motion to Present All Original Documents forwarded from the District Court. 6. Petition for Motions/Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis forwarded from the District Court. [ # 10 ] This court has carefully reviewed the final order of the district court, the record on appeal, and appellants motions and other filings in this court. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues which could be raised are insubstantial and that further briefing would not be helpful to the courts consideration of the issues. See Taylor v. City of New Albany, 979 F.2d 87 (7th Cir. 1992); Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356, 357 (7th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (court can decide case on motions papers and record where briefing would be not assist the court and no member of the panel desires briefing or argument). The district court appropriately dismissed the appellants complaint at screening for making irrational and delusional allegations. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the final order of the district court is summarily AFFIRMED. Any requests or contentions in Dukes other filings have been rejected. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [11] [7260488] [22-2455] (MM) [Entered: 09/14/2022 12:51 PM]
September 14, 2022 Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke for permission to appeal in forma pauperis, to seal record, to transfer copies of all material submitted to the Eastern District of Wisconsin, for a suspension of the rules, and for a case management conference. (Forwarded from the District Court) [10] [7260452] [22-2455] (PS) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:26 AM]
September 14, 2022 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke (Forwarded from the District Court) [9] [7260449] [22-2455] (PS) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:23 AM]
September 14, 2022 Filing 8 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke. [8] [7260447] [22-2455] (PS) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:21 AM]
September 8, 2022 Filing 7 Exhibits filed by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke. [7] [7259374] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:44 PM]
September 8, 2022 Filing 6 Filed notice of a lawsuit and request to waive service of a summons by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke. [6] [7259372] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:44 PM]
September 8, 2022 Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7259370] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:43 PM]
September 8, 2022 Filing 4 Pro se emergency motion filed by Appellant Deon Lewis Duke for a suspension of the rules. [4] [7259367] [22-2455] (CAG) [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:42 PM]
August 18, 2022 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Deon Lewis Duke leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/18/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/19/2022 for Appellant Deon Lewis Duke [7255364] [3] [7255364] [22-2455] (AP) [Entered: 08/18/2022 12:31 PM]
August 17, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7255313] [22-2455] (AP) [Entered: 08/18/2022 10:30 AM]
August 17, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/31/2022. [1] [7255304] [22-2455] (AP) [Entered: 08/18/2022 10:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Deon Duke v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DEON LEWIS DUKE, formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing, formerly doing business as Deon LLC, formerly doing business as Option Inc
Represented By: Deon Lewis Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALPHABET INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: META PLATFORMS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?