Steven F. Helfand v. TikTok Inc.
| TIKTOK INC. |
| PLAINTIFFS' CO-LEAD COUNSEL and PLAINTIFFS' LIAISON COUNSEL |
| STEVEN F. HELFAND |
| DEFENDANTS' LEAD COUNSEL |
| 22-2682 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 12 ][13][7265980] [22-2682] (HTP) [Entered: 10/12/2022 01:27 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/12/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7265987-2] [7265987] [22-2682] (HTP) [Entered: 10/12/2022 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 12 Motion filed by Appellees Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel, Defendants' Lead Counsel and Appellant Steven F. Helfand to dismiss case. [12] [7265695] [22-2682] (Carroll, Katrina) [Entered: 10/11/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Reply by Appellee Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel Attorney Elizabeth A. Fegan to Motion to Dismiss of Plaintiffs-Appellees. [11][7265206] [22-2682] (Fegan, Elizabeth) [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellant Steven F. Helfand to Motion to Dismiss on 10/03/22. [10][7264754] [22-2682] (Helfand, Steven) [Entered: 10/05/2022 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 9 Motion filed by Appellee Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel to dismiss case. [9] [7264474] [22-2682] (Fegan, Elizabeth) [Entered: 10/03/2022 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Elizabeth A. Fegan for Appellee Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel. Additional Parties: Plaintiffs and the Class. [8] [7264470] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2682] (Fegan, Elizabeth) [Entered: 10/03/2022 04:53 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Appellants unopposed motion for electronic filing. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED. Appellant Steven Helfand is granted leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. JEH [7] [7263853] [22-2682] (PS) [Entered: 09/29/2022 02:44 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven F. Helfand for electronic filing. [6] [7263558] [22-2682] (PS) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Steven F. Helfand. [5] [7263552] [22-2682] (PS) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:11 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/28/2022 for Steven F. Helfand. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/28/2022 for Defendants' Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel and Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/19/2022 for Appellant Steven F. Helfand [4] [7263462] [22-2682] (CAG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:10 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [3] [7263460] [22-2682] (CAG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Steven F. Helfand. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7262796] [22-2682] (AD) [Entered: 09/26/2022 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven F. Helfand by 09/27/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 10/05/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/05/2022 for Appellant Steven F. Helfand. [1] [7262295] [22-2682] (ER) [Entered: 09/22/2022 12:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
