Thomas Habersham v. Veterans Adminstration
| THOMAS C. HABERSHAM |
| VETERANS ADMINSTRATION |
| 22-2685 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details). Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [9] [7272328] [22-2685] (HTP) [Entered: 11/09/2022 09:45 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed Response by Appellant Thomas C. Habersham to courts request. [8][7271220] [22-2685] (CAG) [Entered: 11/03/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Thomas C. Habersham. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7269865] [22-2685] (CAG) [Entered: 10/28/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Response by Appellee Veterans Adminstration to Court Order of 10/18/2022. [6][7267906] [22-2685] (Fischer, Rachana) [Entered: 10/20/2022 02:09 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: On consideration of the paper filed by appellant Thomas C. Habersham on October 11, 2022, which may be appellant Thomas C. Habershams best attempt to respond to the courts order of September 26, 2022, regarding appellate jurisdiction, appellee shall file, on or before October 25, 2022, a response to appellant Thomas Habershams filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 26, 2022. DW [5] [7267288] [22-2685] (AD) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:48 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Thomas C. Habersham pleading for the court to hear my case. [4] [7265750] [22-2685] (MAN) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:06 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Thomas C. Habersham is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Thomas C. Habersham by 10/25/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 6473. [3] [7265664] [22-2685] (AD) [Entered: 10/11/2022 12:02 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Thomas C. Habersham shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7263021] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Thomas C. Habersham by 10/11/2022. [2] [7263021] [22-2685] (FP) [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:30 PM]
|
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Thomas C. Habersham by 09/28/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 10/06/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/01/2022 for Thomas C. Habersham [1] [7262362] [22-2685] (AP) [Entered: 09/22/2022 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Habersham v. Veterans Adminstration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS C. HABERSHAM | |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Habersham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: VETERANS ADMINSTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Rachana N. Fischer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
