Ricardo Gutierrez, et al v. Wemagine.AI LLP
RICARDO GUTIERREZ and SHANNON ROSS |
WEMAGINE.AI LLP |
22-2983 |
November 2, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, all proceedings in this appeal are STAYED pending further court order. Counsel for the Appellant and Appellee is directed to make a telephonic or electronic mail status report to the Circuit Mediation Office on 01/20/2023. This requirement may be satisfied by filing a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) to dismiss the appeal. [7279989] [22-2983] (AD) [Entered: 12/19/2022 12:03 PM] |
Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 01/19/2023 for Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/21/2023 for Wemagine.AI LLP. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/14/2023 for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. RJS [7275260] [22-2983] (HTP) [Entered: 11/23/2022 04:25 PM] |
Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Max S. Roberts for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [9] [7274381] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2983]--[Edited 11/21/2022 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Roberts, Max) [Entered: 11/18/2022 05:49 PM] |
Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Brittany S. Scott for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [8] [7274380] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2983]--[Edited 11/21/2022 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Scott, Brittany) [Entered: 11/18/2022 05:47 PM] |
Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Philip L. Fraietta for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [7] [7274377] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2983] (Fraietta, Philip) [Entered: 11/18/2022 05:45 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [6] [7273760] [22-2983] (Larry, James) [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:04 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 01/09/2023 for Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/08/2023 for Wemagine.AI LLP. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/01/2023 for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. RJS [7272855] [22-2983] (CG) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:19 PM] |
Filing 4 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Friday, December 9, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [4] [7272852] [22-2983] (CG) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:15 PM] |
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mario M. Iveljic for Appellee Wemagine.AI LLP. [3] [7271365] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2983] (Iveljic, Mario) [Entered: 11/04/2022 10:15 AM] |
Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney J. Dominick Larry for Appellants Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [2] [7271262] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2983]--[Edited 11/03/2022 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Larry, James) [Entered: 11/03/2022 04:24 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/16/2022. Appellants' brief due on or before 12/12/2022 for Ricardo Gutierrez and Shannon Ross. [1] [7271229] [22-2983] (PS) [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.