Darius Printup v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al
DARIUS PRINTUP |
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL, JENNIFER GARDNER and DANA SKINNER |
23-1292 |
February 15, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER re: Request to withdraw appeal. [ # 3 ] This appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to FRAP 42(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [4][7293672] [23-1292] (PS) [Entered: 02/24/2023 04:24 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 02/24/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7293675-2] [7293675] [23-1292] (PS) [Entered: 02/24/2023 04:34 PM] |
Filing 3 Pro se letter filed by Appellant Darius Printup. [3] [7293336] [23-1292] (MAN) [Entered: 02/23/2023 04:02 PM] |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7291731] [23-1292] (AD) [Entered: 02/16/2023 11:19 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/01/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Darius Printup by 02/21/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/17/2023. [1] [7291726] [23-1292] (AD) [Entered: 02/16/2023 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.