Joshua Bean v. Nancy Marthakis, et al
| JOSHUA BEAN |
| NANCY MARTHAKIS, D.O., Medical Director of Indiana State Prison, KIMBERLY PFLUGHAUPT, APN, DIANE THEWS, APN, CHRISTINA CHICO, Psy.D. and STEPHANIE RILEY, Dr., she is at least part of Centurion Health's UM Referrals Committee, but also may be its Reg. Medical Director |
| 24-2362 |
| August 7, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Joshua Bean. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [9] [7405524] [24-2362] (DAB) [Entered: 09/13/2024 03:45 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER re: Verified motion for an extension of time to pay appellate docketing fee and/or to apply the "Prison Mailbox Rule" to that payment. [ # 5 ] A review of the courts docket shows that on August 27, 2024, this court received confirmation from the district court that the appellant paid the appellate filing fees in full. Accordingly, the appellants motion is DENIED as unnecessary. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. CDH [8] [7401957] [24-2362] (CG) [Entered: 08/28/2024 09:13 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This court has received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Accordingly, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 09/26/2024 for Joshua Bean. JXK [7401928] [24-2362] (AD) [Entered: 08/27/2024 03:52 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed notice from the District Court that the remaining $150.00 of the $605.00 appellate fee was received. [6][7401872] [24-2362] (CAG) [Entered: 08/27/2024 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Joshua Bean to extend time to pay appellate docketing fee and/or to apply the "prison mailbox rule" to that payment (Forwarded from the District Court). [5] [7400809] [24-2362] (DAB) [Entered: 08/21/2024 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $455.00 from Appellant Joshua Bean on 08/15/2024. [4] [7399669] [24-2362] (CAG) [Entered: 08/15/2024 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7398378] [24-2362] (AD) [Entered: 08/08/2024 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Dr. Wilks, Doctor, Karen J. Fagan, Tiffany Turner, Jacqueline Monaco, Teagan Nelson, Roxanne Liston, Irasema A. Hernandez, Betty Boggs, Ron Neal and Kristen Dauss. [2] [7398376] [24-2362] (AD) [Entered: 08/08/2024 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/21/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/06/2024. [1] [7398372] [24-2362] (AD) [Entered: 08/08/2024 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
