Robert Nieto v. USA
| ROBERT NIETO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-3082 |
| November 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Robert Nieto leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 01/06/2025. [8] [7427107] [24-3082] (CG) [Entered: 01/06/2025 11:17 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time to file docketing statement. The motion is GRANTED, and the appellant shall file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by January 21, 2025. The clerk will resend the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement. In his docketing statement, the appellant should attempt to provide the information listed in the Pro Se Instructions, particularly the date of the district court judgment or order being challenged in this appeal. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. [ # 4 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 0423 8767 08. SCR [7] [7425705] [24-3082] (HTP) [Entered: 12/26/2024 01:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [6] [7425654] [24-3082] (CG) [Entered: 12/26/2024 11:16 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Robert Nieto to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7425597] [24-3082] (CAH) [Entered: 12/26/2024 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Robert Nieto to extend time to file the docketing statement [4] [7425595] [24-3082] (CAH) [Entered: 12/26/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/23/2024 for Appellant Robert Nieto. [3] [7422375] [24-3082] (AD) [Entered: 12/09/2024 08:51 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Robert Nieto is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number:. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Robert Nieto by 12/16/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 1354. JR [2] [7420716] [24-3082] (CG) [Entered: 12/02/2024 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 10/28/2024. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Robert Nieto by 11/19/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/29/2024 for Appellant Robert Nieto. Transcript information sheet due by 11/29/2024. [1] [7417801] [24-3082] (HTP) [Entered: 11/14/2024 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Nieto v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David E. Hollar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROBERT NIETO | |
| Represented By: | Robert Nieto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
