<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Jose Salinas v. White House, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca7/26-2188</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca7/26-2188/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:50:04 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:50:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Jose Salinas v. White House, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 3</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record suggests that the order appealed from may not yet be a final decision within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291. A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely motion under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district courts civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). In the present case, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on June 2, 2026, within 28 days of entry of judgment on May 12, 2026. This motion may be a timely Rule 59 motion. See Carlson v. CSX Transp., Inc., 758 F.3d 819, 82526 (7th Cir. 2014). As such, it appears to render this appeal premature, because the district court has not yet disposed of the motion and entered its order on the civil docket. Florian v. Sequa Corp., 294 F.3d 828, 829 (7th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, proceedings in this appeal are SUSPENDED pending the district court's resolution of the motion for reconsideration. If a party contends that this appeal should not be suspended, then that party should file a brief memorandum on or before June 18, 2026, stating why suspension is not appropriate. Further, appellant shall file a status report within seven days of a ruling on the motion for reconsideration, or on or shortly before July 6, 2026, if no order has yet issued. JXK [3] [3] [7530539] [26-2188] (FP) [Entered: 06/04/2026 12:32 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35176034</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7530208] [26-2188] (CG) [Entered: 06/03/2026 12:03 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35176035</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                U.S. civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jose E. Salinas by 06/09/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 06/16/2026. [1] [7530203] [26-2188] (CG) [Entered: 06/03/2026 11:46 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35176036</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
