<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Mathiew Fox v. Alexandra Smathers, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca7/26-3139</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca7/26-3139/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:07:04 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:07:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Mathiew Fox v. Alexandra Smathers, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 4</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7564044] JXK [4] [7564044] [26-3139] (HTP) [Entered: 10/19/2026 03:33 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_38322684</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Lora Reinders and Pathways Consulting. [3] [7564043] [26-3139] (HTP) [Entered: 10/19/2026 03:32 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_38322685</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Pro se emergency motion filed by Appellant Mathiew Rae Fox for administrative stay, stay pending appeal, expedited consideration, and coordinated treatment with related appeal emergency statement. [2] [7564040] [26-3139, 26-2694] (HTP) [Entered: 10/19/2026 03:30 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_38322686</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mathiew Rae Fox by 10/23/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 11/02/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/02/2026 for Appellant Mathiew Rae Fox. [1] [7564027] [26-3139] (HTP) [Entered: 10/19/2026 03:22 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_38322687</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
