United States v. Edward Raifsnider
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Edward Lee Raifsnider, also known as William Biaselli, also known as John E. Scott, also known as Edward John Snider, also known as Scott Emmy, also known as Tom L. Smith, also known as Rick Williams, also known as John Phillips, also known as George Thom
Case Number: 11-1353
Filed: February 15, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 16, 2011 Summary United States v. Raifsnider

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. Edward Raifsnider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Randall D. Eggert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Edward Lee Raifsnider, also known as William Biaselli, also known as John E. Scott, also known as Edward John Snider, also known as Scott Emmy, also known as Tom L. Smith, also known as Rick Williams, also known as John Phillips, also known as George Thom
Represented By: John H. Kizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?