Kevin Linn v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Linn
Defendant / Appellee: Randy Watson, Warden, Varner and Varner SuperMax Units, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Administrator, ADC, Keith Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Ray Hobbs, Former Director, ADC, Michael Bolden, Chief Security Officer, Varner Unit and Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit
Case Number: 19-2169
Filed: June 7, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 11, 2020 Kevin Linn v. Jeremy Andrews

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance. Briefing held in abeyance pending ruling on motion to dismiss and motion to strike. [4813462] [19-2169] (MDS) [Entered: 07/30/2019 10:11 AM]
July 29, 2019 MOTION to dismiss case, AND to strike previously filed brief Appellant/Petitioner Brief, Doc. No. [ # 4810078-2 ], filed by Attorney Mr. Vincent P. France for Appellees Raymond Naylor, Randy Watson, Ray Hobbs, Keith Waddle, Jeremy Andrews and Mr. Michael Bolden w/service 07/29/2019. [4813089] [19-2169]--[Edited 07/29/2019 by MDS - Reason: Edited to add additional relief.] (VPF) [Entered: 07/29/2019 01:06 PM]
July 18, 2019 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Kevin Linn. w/service 07/19/2019 , Length: 3 pages. 5 copies made by USCA-8. Brief of Jeremy Andrews, Michael Bolden, Ray Hobbs, Raymond Naylor, Keith Waddle and Randy Watson due on 08/19/2019 [4810078] [19-2169] (MDS) [Entered: 07/19/2019 04:07 PM]
June 7, 2019 Prisoner case docketed. [4795296] [19-2169] (CMH) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:19 AM]
June 7, 2019 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings & Recommendations dated 5/6/2019, Order and Judgment both dated 5/22/2019, and Order dated 6/5/2019. [4795314] [19-2169] (CMH) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:34 AM]
June 7, 2019 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Kevin Linn due 07/17/2019. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. Appellant reply brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee brief. [4795317] [19-2169] (CMH) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kevin Linn v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Kevin Linn
Represented By: Kevin Linn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Randy Watson, Warden, Varner and Varner SuperMax Units
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Administrator, ADC
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Keith Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Ray Hobbs, Former Director, ADC
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Michael Bolden, Chief Security Officer, Varner Unit
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit
Represented By: Vincent P. France
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?