Derek Vice v. Brent Fluke
Petitioner: Derek C. Vice
Respondent: Brent Fluke, Warden
Case Number: 19-2315
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 PETITION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Derek C. Vice w/service 06/18/2019 [4801023] [19-2315] (MMH) [Entered: 06/24/2019 03:09 PM]
June 24, 2019 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4801013] [19-2315] (MMH) [Entered: 06/24/2019 03:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derek Vice v. Brent Fluke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brent Fluke, Warden
Represented By: Sherri Sundem Wald
Represented By: Jason Ravnsborg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derek C. Vice
Represented By: Derek C. Vice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?