William Sours v. Anne Precythe, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: William Scott Sours
Defendant / Appellee: Gil Long, Offender Finance Officer, MODC, Individual and Official Capacity, Anne L. Precythe, Director Missouri Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity, John Ashcroft, Secretary of State, Individual and Official Capacity, Alana Boyles, Director, Adult Institutions, Individual and Official Capacity, John Doe, Missouri Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity, Cindy Griffith, Zone Director, MOCD, Individual and Official Capacity and Stanley Payne, Warden, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity
Case Number: 19-2740
Filed: August 15, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2019 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mr. William Scott Sours w/service 09/06/2019. Sealed. [4827816] [19-2740] (CAH) [Entered: 09/06/2019 03:03 PM]
August 15, 2019 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4819818] [19-2740] (CAH) [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:57 PM]
August 15, 2019 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/12/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4819813] [19-2740] (CAH) [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:53 PM]
August 15, 2019 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 7/25/19, Order of Dismissal 7/25/19, Order 8/9/19. [4819812] [19-2740] (CAH) [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:51 PM]
August 15, 2019 Prisoner case docketed. [4819803] [19-2740] (CAH) [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Sours v. Anne Precythe, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: William Scott Sours
Represented By: William Scott Sours
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Gil Long, Offender Finance Officer, MODC, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Anne L. Precythe, Director Missouri Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Ashcroft, Secretary of State, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Alana Boyles, Director, Adult Institutions, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe, Missouri Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Cindy Griffith, Zone Director, MOCD, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Stanley Payne, Warden, ERDCC, Individual and Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?