United States v. Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Defendant / Appellant: Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 21-1981
Filed: May 3, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 8, 2022 Summary United States v. Salvador Nunez-Hernandez

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 CRIMINAL case docketed. [5031114] [21-1981, 21-1982] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/03/2021 08:47 AM]
May 3, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, judgment of 4/28/2021 [5031121] [21-1981] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/03/2021 08:58 AM]
May 3, 2021 CONSOLIDATED CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 05/24/2021. Transcript due 05/24/2021. Brief of appellant Salvador Nunez-Hernandez due 06/07/2021. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5031129] [21-1981, 21-1982] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/03/2021 09:07 AM]
May 3, 2021 MOTION to withdraw as retained counsel, filed by Attorney Mr. Andrew Marshall Irlbeck for Appellant Mr. Salvador Nunez-Hernandez in 21-1981, 21-1982 w/service 05/03/2021. [5031267] [21-1981, 21-1982] (AMI) [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:03 PM]
May 3, 2021 APPEARANCE filed by Thomas More Hollenhorst for Appellee United States of America w/service 05/03/2021 [5031286] [21-1981] (TMH) [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:33 PM]
May 3, 2021 MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Mr. Thomas More Hollenhorst for Appellee United States of America in 21-1981, 21-1982 w/service 05/03/2021. [5031315] [21-1981, 21-1982] (TMH) [Entered: 05/03/2021 01:20 PM]
May 3, 2021 CLERK ORDER:Appellants retained attorneys motion to withdraw and the United States motion to dismiss this appeal will both be held in abeyance for 21 days to permit appellant to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the United States District Court. If no in forma pauperis motion is filed within 21 days, the court will proceed to consider the pending motions. If a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed, the court will continue to hold the motions in abeyance pending the district courts disposition of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The briefing schedule will be held in abeyance pending the resolution of these pending matters. [5031523] [21-1981, 21-1982] (CRJ) [Entered: 05/03/2021 04:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Represented By: Salvador Nunez-Hernandez
Represented By: Andrew Marshall Irlbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Thomas More Hollenhorst
Represented By: Chelsea Walcker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?