Antrell Lewis v. United States
Antrell Desharron Lewis |
United States of America |
22-3444 |
November 28, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 01/06/2023, Denying COA. [5233764] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 01/09/2023 09:04 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file COA, filed by Appellant Mr. Antrell Desharron Lewis, w/service 12/19/2022. [5228501] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 12/19/2022 12:23 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Denying [ # 5228501-2 ] motion for extension of time to file application for COA as premature, filed by Appellant Mr. Antrell Desharron Lewis. [5228609] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 12/19/2022 02:54 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:for limited remand. This case is remanded to the district court for a determination of whether to issue a certificate of appealability, with directions that, if granted, the certificate of appealability specify the issue or issues that are to be considered on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253; Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005); Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518 (8th Cir. 1997). [5227296] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:18 AM] |
RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Addendum, and Sentencing Worksheet, Source Location: USDC / NI [5225483] [22-3444] (STL) [Entered: 12/09/2022 09:35 AM] |
RECORD FILED - SEALED RECORDS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Sealed District Court document #15 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / NI [5223947] [22-3444] (STL) [Entered: 12/05/2022 03:09 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order 09/16/2022. [5221228] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 11/28/2022 09:30 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5221231] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 11/28/2022 09:33 AM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5221212] [22-3444] (CJO) [Entered: 11/28/2022 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Antrell Lewis v. United States | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Antrell Desharron Lewis | |
Represented By: | Antrell Desharron Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Dan Chatham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.