Courtney Richmond v. Nolan Wiese, et al
Courtney Richmond |
Backyard Specialty Foods, Nolan Weise and Minnehaha Court Clerks Office, Civil |
24-2065 |
May 22, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT FILED - Motions and documents from appellant filed by Courtney Richmond w/service 07/01/2024 by USCA8 [5409059] [24-2065] (NDG) [Entered: 07/01/2024 02:36 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Courtney Richmond due 08/07/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5408501] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 06/28/2024 12:56 PM] |
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 24-2065: paid - cs] Fee was paid in district court: USCA Appeal Fees received $605.00 receipt number 400003543 re 48 Notice of Appeal, filed by Courtney Richmond. (DJP) [5407605] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 06/26/2024 01:55 PM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Backyard Specialty Foods. - FOR CAL [5398202] [24-2065] (HLW) [Entered: 05/29/2024 08:53 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Hilary L. Williamson for Appellees Backyard Specialty Foods and Nolan Weise w/service 05/29/2024 [5398195] [24-2065] (HLW) [Entered: 05/29/2024 08:47 AM] |
CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/25/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5398019] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 05/28/2024 02:51 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 05/28/2024 denying motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5398018] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 05/28/2024 02:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Robert B. Anderson for Appellee Minnehaha Court Clerks Office w/service 05/28/2024 [5397843] [24-2065] (RBA) [Entered: 05/28/2024 11:17 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of Opinion and Order filed 4/26/2024, Judgment filed 4/26/2024, and Notice of Appeal filed 5/21/2024. [5396750] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2024 08:07 AM] |
CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5396752] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2024 08:08 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [5396745] [24-2065] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2024 08:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.