Cody Atkins v. Chad Pringle
| Cody Michael Atkins |
| Warden Chad Pringle |
| 24-2643 |
| August 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Appellant Cody Michael Atkins w/service 08/13/2024. Response of Chad Pringle due 08/27/2024. [5423918] [24-2643] (CBO) [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:40 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5423871] [24-2643] (CBO) [Entered: 08/13/2024 01:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cody Atkins v. Chad Pringle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Cody Michael Atkins | |
| Represented By: | Cody Michael Atkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chad Pringle | |
| Represented By: | Drew Howard Wrigley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
