Zakariya Abdikarim v. Jesse Jahner, et al
| Zakariya Abdikarim |
| Dr. Haider, Mental Health, VA Hospital, Jesse Jahner, Cass County Sheriff, ND, Officer C. Olson, Cass County Jail, ND, Fargo Cass Public Health and CPL Moody, Cass County Jail, Fargo, ND |
| 24-2692 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of court order of 10/17/2024 regarding payment of appellate fees [5447537] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 10/17/2024 03:52 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis have been considered and are granted [ # 5431730-2 ], [ # 5433778-2 ]. The judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. The full $605 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Oct 2024 [5446785] [24-2692] (BNW) [Entered: 10/16/2024 12:28 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5446782] [24-2692] (BNW) [Entered: 10/16/2024 12:24 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of third notice of appeal [5433775] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 09/10/2024 09:47 AM] |
| SECOND MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Zakariya Abdikarim. [5433778] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 09/10/2024 09:54 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of second notice of appeal. [5431886] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 09/04/2024 12:15 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Zakariya Abdikarim in 24-2692 w/service 08/27/2024. [5431730] [24-2692, 24-2699, 24-2706, 24-2715, 24-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 09/04/2024 10:11 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5427125] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 08/22/2024 11:04 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dismissing complaint 7/22/24, and Judgment 7/22/24 [5427159] [24-2692]--[Edited 09/11/2024 by MMH to add 7/22 Order ] (MMH) [Entered: 08/22/2024 11:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/19/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5427178] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 08/22/2024 12:12 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5427186] [24-2692] (MMH) [Entered: 08/22/2024 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
