Latisha Babb v. Jennifer Lozowsky, et al
|Petitioner - Appellee,:
||LATISHA MARIE BABB
|Respondent - Appellant,:
||JENNIFER LOZOWSKY and E. K. MCDANIEL
||July 25, 2011
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 6, 2013
Filed order and amended opinion (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MARY H. MURGUIA). The Opinion filed January 11, 2013, appearing at 704 F.3d 1246, is amended as follows: (See order for full text) Petitioner Appellee s motion to join the Federal Public Defender s amicus curiae brief is DENIED (Doc. 39).Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of Petitioner Appellee is GRANTED (Doc. 41).With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Petitioner Appellee Babb s and Respondent Appellant Lozowsky s petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Clifton and Judge Murguia vote to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc and Judge Tashima so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied (Docs. 32, 33). No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?