Roosevelt Moore v. M. Biter
|Petitioner - Appellant,:
||ROOSEVELT BRIAN MOORE
|Respondent - Appellee,:
||M. D. BITER, Warden
||October 21, 2011
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 12, 2014
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN) (DFO dissents) The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained. Judge O Scannlain s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently with this Order. 
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?