Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
| EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., TATUNG COMPANY, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC., NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD., MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHARP CORPORATION, NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., CHI MEI CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION, HITACHI LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD. |
| In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation |
| INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS |
| ANDREA KANE |
| 12-16839 |
| August 21, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Antitrust |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Motion for miscellaneous relief [NEC Entities' Motion to Amend Caption]. Date of service: 08/28/2013. [8760506] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 08/28/2013 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 39 Terminated Sean David Unger for Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16830, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16839, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15920, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15929, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15930 and Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15934 [8758404] [12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934] (CW) [Entered: 08/27/2013 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 38 Received Attorney Sean David Unger, Esquire for Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934 letter dated 08/22/2013 re: request to be removed from service. Terminated counsel. Served on 08/22/2013 [8758392] [12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934] (CW) [Entered: 08/27/2013 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 37 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MGS) Court records reflect that the appellant has failed to file an opening brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Ninth Cir. Rule 42-1 and Ninth Cir. Rule 31-2.3. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [8685435] (BJB) [Entered: 06/28/2013 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 36 Terminated Chet Alan Kronenberg for LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. in 12-16839 [8664213] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2013 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 35 Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Correspondence: Correspondence to Clerk re: Notice of Settlement in Underlying Case. Date of service: 06/11/2013 [8663910] (Kronenberg, Chet) [Entered: 06/11/2013 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 34 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellant's motion to dismiss this appeal without prejudice is denied. Appellants alternate motion for remand is denied. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant may file a renewed motion to dismiss the appeal voluntarily, with prejudice. In the absence of a renewed motion, the opening brief is due April 1, 2013; the answering brief is due May 1, 2013; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. (MOATT) [8534235] (BJB) [Entered: 03/01/2013 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 33 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response to motion (,motion to dismiss the case voluntarily pursuant to rule 42b). Date of service: 01/22/2013. [8482422] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 01/22/2013 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Appellant Andrea Kane Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 01/09/2013. [8468461]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached cert of service, resent notice. 01/14/2013 by ASW] (Langone, Christopher) [Entered: 01/09/2013 08:19 PM] |
| Filing 31 Terminated Joel Willard for Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. in 12-16839 [8451304] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 12/24/2012 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. Correspondence: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. Date of service: 12/21/2012. [8450233]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect content of filing. Resent NDA. 12/21/2012 by RY] (Brass, Rachel) [Entered: 12/21/2012 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 29 Added attorney John Bogdanov for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16839. [8432445] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John D. Bogdanov for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432393] (Bogdanov, John) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 27 Added attorney Tracy Rena Kirkham for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16839. [8432278] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 26 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tracy R. Kirkham for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432235] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 25 Added attorney Josef Cooper for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16839. [8432109] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Josef D. Cooper for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432092] (Cooper, Josef) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 23 Added attorney John Bogdanov for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16839. [8432072] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Josef D. Cooper for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432052] (Cooper, Josef) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 21 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner):The appellants opposed motion to stay appellate proceedings pending the district courts resolution of the motion for an indicative ruling is granted. The appellees cross-motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is denied. This appeal is stayed until February 4, 2013, or 14 days after the district court issues its ruling on the indicative motion, whichever occurs earlier. At or prior to the expiration of the stay, the appellant shall file the opening brief or a motion for appropriate relief. If the opening brief is filed, the answering brief will be due within 30 days after service of the opening brief. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. The filing of the opening brief or the failure to file a further motion will terminate the stay. (Pro Mo) [8427248] (MS) [Entered: 12/05/2012 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response opposing motion (,motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 11/28/2012. [8418070] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 11/28/2012 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 19 Added attorney Patrick B. Clayton for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16839. [8414730] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 11/26/2012 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 18 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick B. Clayton for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 11/26/2012. [8414529] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 11/26/2012 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellant Andrea Kane Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 01/22/2013. Date of service: 11/19/2012. [8408342] (Langone, Christopher) [Entered: 11/19/2012 10:47 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed order MEDIATION (BS):Due to a court docketing error, the caption of the order filed November 2, 2012, scheduling a dial-in settlement assessment conference call to discuss possible resolution of the appeals arising from the settlement of the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, incorrectly included appeals related to the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. The dial-in settlement assessment conference call, currently scheduled for Tuesday, November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time), will address only the appeals related to the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, Docket Nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005. No settlement assessment conference has been scheduled at this time to address the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. Circuit Mediator Peter W. Sherwood (Peter_Sherwood@ca9.uscourts.gov) will conduct the conference call on November 13, 2012. On or before November 9, 2012, all counsel to appeal nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005 who intend to participate in the conference shall provide their names and contact information to the Mediation Assistant at Elisa_Monterola@ca9.uscourts.gov. The dial-in information previously provided remains unchanged. [8391307] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] (KKW) [Entered: 11/07/2012 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed order MEDIATION (BS): The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone settlement assessment conference, with counsel only, on November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss whether this case is appropriate for participation in the Mediation Program. Dial-in information is available to counsel of record as a separate document attached to the electronic filing notification of this order. If any counsel of record is not able to access the dial-in information, please notify the Mediation Assistant immediately at Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. On or before November 8, 2012, the parties shall provide the name and contact information of all counsel intending to participate in the conference to Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] [8385659] (KKW) [Entered: 11/02/2012 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 09/28/2012. [8341532] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 09/28/2012 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Correct Entry: [ # 14 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Correspondence: Request to be Removed from Docket. Date of service: 09/27/2012 [8340012] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 09/27/2012 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Andrea Kane Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/24/2012. [8335396]--[COURT UPDATE: Replaced PDF with "Print to PDF version" to resolve viewing errors. Resent notice. 09/25/2012 by ASW] (Langone, Christopher) [Entered: 09/24/2012 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 Added attorney Christopher Langone for Andrea Kane, in case 12-16839. [8335018] (CW) [Entered: 09/24/2012 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher Vincent Langone for Appellant Andrea Kane. Date of service: 09/24/2012. [8334980] (Langone, Christopher) [Entered: 09/24/2012 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of CHRISTOPHER VINCENT LANGONE for Appellant Andrea Kane. Date of service: 09/24/2012. [8334769] (Langone, Christopher) [Entered: 09/24/2012 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): Appellant has failed to file a Mediation Questionnaire in accordance with the courts order of August 30, 2012. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (available on the court's website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov) or a motion to dismiss the appeal voluntarily under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or shall show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal. See Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [8325570] (BJB) [Entered: 09/17/2012 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): The Court of Appeals records do not indicate that appellant has filed a Mediation Questionnaire in accordance with Circuit Rule 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing of this order, appellant shall: (a) file a Mediation Questionnaire (available on the court's website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov); (b) dismiss the appeal voluntarily pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); or (c) show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [8305444] (BJB) [Entered: 08/30/2012 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 6 Added attorney Rachel Susan Brass for Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., in case 12-16839. [8303612] (CW) [Entered: 08/29/2012 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rachel S. Brass for Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.. Date of service: 08/29/2012. [8303546] (Brass, Rachel) [Entered: 08/29/2012 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Joel Willard for Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. [8302977] (JFF) [Entered: 08/28/2012 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/28/2012. [8302934] (Sanders, Joel) [Entered: 08/28/2012 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joel Willard for Appellee Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.. Date of service: 08/28/2012. [8302885] (Willard, Joel) [Entered: 08/28/2012 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/28/2012. Transcript ordered by 09/10/2012. Transcript due 10/09/2012. Appellant Andrea Kane opening brief due 11/19/2012. Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 12/18/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8294452] (RT) [Entered: 08/21/2012 03:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
