In re: First Southern National Bank, et al v. Sunnyslope Housing Limited Par
||In the Matter of: SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
||FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK
||SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
||October 10, 2012
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 23, 2017
Filed order and amended opinion (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ALEX KOZINSKI, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SUSAN P. GRABER, RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, CARLOS T. BEA, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, ANDREW D. HURWITZ, JOHN B. OWENS and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND). (Opinion by Judge Hurwitz; Dissent by Judge Kozinski) The opinion filed May 26, 2017, is amended as follows: 1. At page 9 of the slip opinion, delete 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(5)(B) and replace it with 11 U.S.C. 1129(b)(2)(A). 2. At page 11 of the slip opinion, delete Cornerstone at Camelback LLC invested $1.2 million in the complex. and in the next sentence, the word then. The amended opinion should state: After confirmation, First Southern obtained a stay of the plan of reorganization from the district court pending appeal. 3. At page 11 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence following First Southern again appealed. and replace it with The district court denied First Southern s request for a stay. Cornerstone at Camelback LLC invested $1.2 million in the complex, and the plan was funded. The district court affirmed the reorganization plan as modified. Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED.  [12-17241, 12-17327, 13-16164, 13-16180]
|September 22, 2016
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS) Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.  [12-17241, 12-17327, 13-16164, 13-16180]
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?